[JWplugins] Question about plug-in name for layers

[KennethKen at aol.com]

Looks great!
 
"Implode" it is; however...if I didn't already know how amazing your work  
is I would not dream that it had that flexibility. I would have thought that 
it  does the same thing that "Implode" in Finale does - just with a 
different UI.  After all, it is named exactly the same!
 
At least, "Implosion", "Implode+" or "Super-Fantastic-Mega-Implode" would  
give the uninitiated an idea that it's something different and not simply  
repackaging. :-)
 
Ken
 
 
In a message dated 1/8/2013 4:19:20 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
jari.williamsson at mailbox.swipnet.se writes:

On  2013-01-08 20:10, Christopher Smith wrote:

> Implode I think is  better, because we already associate
> it with the Finale function of  the same name (I assume yours is better!) 
Merge
> could mean almost  anything.

Thanks, I'll use "Implode".

The implode for  layers-to-single-layer will be identical to the already 
available JW Merge  Layers.

Attached is a sample of how the staff implode  works.


Best regards,

Jari  Williamsson


_______________________________________________
JWplugins  mailing  list
JWplugins at jwmusic.nu
http://jwmusic.nu/mailman/listinfo/jwplugins_jwmusic.nu