[JWplugins] Question about plug-in name for layers

[Christopher Smith]

As long as the first word is "layers", I am all right with it. It helps find it in the list, too.

For example, I'm not sure "JW Yada Yada Tremolos" is a good name, because one searches for "tremolo" and only finds it under letter Y. Maybe "JW Tremolos Yada Yada would be better.

Implode I think is better, because we already associate it with the Finale function of the same name (I assume yours is better!) Merge could mean almost anything.

Christopher




On Tue Jan 8, at TuesdayJan 8 11:26 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:

> On 2013-01-08 16:28, Eric Fiedler wrote:
>> How about simply "JW Layers"?
> 
> To me, "Layers" alone doesn't imply anything about the modification of music lines that appear within chords.
> 
> Another thing: which is best - "Merge" or "Implode"? I would personally now like to rename to "Implode" for layers (instead of "Merge"), to make it opposite of "Explode".
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jari Williamsson
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> JWplugins mailing list
> JWplugins at jwmusic.nu
> http://jwmusic.nu/mailman/listinfo/jwplugins_jwmusic.nu